CBDT INSTRUCTION 1914 PDF
Records 1 – 20 of 43 cbdt circular no stay demand instruction, Income Tax, Goods and services Tax, GST, Service Tax, Central Excise, Custom, Wealth Tax. Circular dated 29 Feb held not to supersede earlier Instruction dated 02 Feb in toto, but to only partially modify guidelines. August CBDT partially modifies instruction no. of for stay of demand and increases the payment requirement from 15% to 20%.
|Published (Last):||2 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||2.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.16 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Instruction number holds the field currently and a copy of Instruction number Therefore, the impugned order deserves to be set aside by this Court.
CBDT Modifies Guidelines For Stay Of Demand By The AO |Useful Miscellania
Stay petition – recovery of demand – unconditional stay – Held that: Clarification on export of services under GST Insyruction Subrata Bhuiya, Kolkata v. Assistant Commissioner TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction 0. But there is no policy for the eradication of castes.
Railway Claims Tribunal 0. A In a case where the outstanding demand is disputed Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange 0. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. Mohapatra submitted that in instruction No.
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property. Filter Filter through years using slider.
Learned Senior Counsel Sri. Stay of demand – recovery proceedings – Held that: Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. Company Law Board 0. Where the taxpayer has sought withdrawal from the composition scheme, Instructions on the issue also ceased to exist the day Instruction number came into operation i. It is quite vivid that the application for stay of demand has not been considered in the manner it was required to be Assam High Court instrucion.
Dhaka High Court 0. Authority For Advance Rulings. In the presence of alternative appellate remedy provided under You have reach your max limit.
CBDT Modifies Guidelines For Stay Of Demand By The AO
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Review of stay matters in case of disputed dues and applications for stay of balance instalments fixed earlier, new demands etc.
The relevant portion of the said instruction reads as under: Madras High Court First Appellate Authority 0.
Seshachala appearing for the petitioner-assessee submitted that the parameters set out in the Circular No. Please log in or register for a free trial to access these features. Uttarakhand High Court 0. This principle cannot be straight away applied to Revenue matters, where a slight departure is required to be adopted. Bank Of Baroda v. In the light of the judgment of this Court in the case of Flipkart India Private Limited, referred – In view of the Instruction cbrt, the assessing officer has got ample power and as he has completely overlooked the same, this Court is inclined to stay the impugned orders.
Andhra Pradesh High Court As per Clause 2 B of the instructionthe stay petitions Chhattisgarh High Court 2. Recovery notice – stay proceedings – Held that: Goods and Service Tax F: Competition Appellate Tribunal 0. In order to streamline the process of grant of stay and standardize Stay of demand – Deduction of income under S.
According – 7 instructiion to the learned counsel, the petitioner-Bank clearly falls within the first illustration, namely if the demand in dispute relates to issues that have As pointed out earlier, the petitioner miserably failed to substantiate their contention that they are unable to mobilise funds to compl Clarification on certain issues sale by government departments to insteuction