LEY 22285 PDF
The appellant alleged that Article 45 of the Broadcasting Law (Ley de .. Por lo que el párrafo primero del Art. 45 de la ley y las normas dictadas en su. , Spanish, Book edition: Radiodifusión: marco regulatorio: Ley nacional de radiodifusión 22,, Decreto reglamentario /81 / [Claudio] Schifer. (Law of , InfoLEG, available at (Gustavo Ybarra, El kirchnerismo logró aprobar en general la nueva ley de medios, DIARIO LA.
|Published (Last):||12 May 2005|
|PDF File Size:||5.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.11 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
After the dictatorship of Alfredo Stroessner —89the use of cadenas nacionales was banned after the system was abused by the military to transmit propaganda. A new law, effective as of August 8,requires television and radio broadcasters to transmit two presidential speeches a year, produced by the state media Radio Illimani and Bolivia TV. In this way, by writing the theatrical piece and making it public by presenting it, the authors and other people who were involved in this production and presentation exercised their right to freedom of expression, which cannot be subject to prior censorship by any organ, notwithstanding the responsibilities which might arise by the commission of offenses or abuses during its creation or representation, or of the measures that might be taken in the case portrayed by Article In this section, the report refers to the States’ domestic jurisprudence, and it includes certain decisions by local tribunals that were handed down during and that reflect the importance of respecting freedom of expression as protected in the American Convention.
In conclusion, and in light of the foregoing, the right to the protection of the honor of the plaintiff has not been violated, as we understand that the journalist, Mr. In some countries, they are enshrined in law; in others, they are informal and cooperative.
The law that defined cadenas was derogated in after the constitutional court ruled that they were illegal, violated the right of citizens to “inform and be informed”, and also kept the public in “informational captivity”.
Criminal defamation and public officials. Radio stations also carry La Hora Nacionalan hour-long radio program aired on Sunday lej, as part of this requirement.
LA “LEGITIMIDAD” DEL ENUNCIADOR JURÍDICO EN LA LEY DE RADIODIFUSIÓN ARGENTINA (/80)
Fourthly, that while this right does not protect libel or other defamation offenses, nor falsity, lies or mistakes when they are a consequence of a careless disregard for the truth, it does protect the press when the information portrayed refers to public matters or public officials, even if the news contains inexact information, as long as its author believes the information to be true and had, in good faith and without malice, aimed at disclosing information of public interest.
Cadenas nacionales are obligatory for all television and radio stations, and are used to broadcast presidential reports and messages of national interest.
Several key can be derived from the opinions and case law mentioned, which lley interpreter must keep in mind in order to arrive to a fair solution of the very delicate issue at hand.
In this case, the law of bank secrecy stated in Article of the Commercial Code is also applicable. This page was last edited on 15 Novemberat Administrative accord regulates cadenas nacionales in Nicaragua.
The right of expression may not be restricted by indirect methods or means, such as the abuse of government or private controls over newsprint, radio broadcasting frequencies, or equipment used in the dissemination of information, or by any other means tending to impede the communication and circulation of ideas and opinions.
Firstly, that the general but naturally, not absolute principle to be kept in mind is that the right to freedom of expression, given its crucial role in promoting public debate and its relation to democratic societies and institutions, when exercised legitimately, is regarded in the national and international arenas as possessing an “extremely high value” which places it in a higher rank in relation to the other civil rights.
Therefore, if the appeal were admitted and the subsequent exhibitions of the piece which has given rise to it prohibited, this Court would incur in a form of prior censorship, which is forbidden to this Court. Supreme Court of Argentina, Decision of September 1 st On one occasion, television stations were forced to broadcast a minute-long musical performance contained within a cadena nacional. Massera 222285 Albano Harguindeguy. They are obligatory for all broadcasters, as is the transmission of state-designed “public good” campaigns.
Consequently, if it is considered that the presentation of the theatrical work in question could entail the applicability of Article Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 above, public entertainments may be subject by law to prior censorship for the sole purpose of regulating access to them for the moral protection of 222285 and adolescence. Regarding issue a it is important to note that given that the funds of the parties whether they have a public or private source are, by constitutional mandate Article 96, paragraph 3 of the National Constitution subject to the principles of publicity and transparency, the number of current accounts, their movement and balance in the commercial banks of the state, private banks or any financial entity are of public interest, and therefore, can be accessed by any person.
Cadena nacional – Wikipedia
The alleged violation was founded on the provision of Article 19 No. Facts of the case. Therefore, it must be concluded, according to the provision of Article 10 of the Republic’s Constitution, that his conduct leey exempt from this Magistrate’s authority.
In its Annual Report, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights noted that “the Inter-American Court of Human Rights “the Court” has stated that because freedom of expression and thought plays a crucial and central role in public debate, the American Convention places an “extremely high value” on this right and reduces to a minimum any restrictions on it.
The Telecommunications Law of requires stations to transmit cadenaswhich may be called for by the president “in case of war, invasion of territory, rebellion, sedition, catastrophe, epidemic or other calamity, grave disturbances of the public order or messages of national interest”. On February 20,the accusation brought by Mr. The aforesaid rule has as an exception that operates in the case that there is unequivocal evidence that a political party has transferred part of its private funds to a privately-owned company.
This article specifies that the executive branch of the national government or of provincial governments may, in exceptional circumstances, use all of the broadcast stations in a state. The first law permitting cadenas nacionales in Ecuador was passed in during the regime of Gen.
As a second point, there is no doubt that there are many other cases that could have been summarized in this report. Report lsy the Situation of Human Rights in Mexico.
States have the obligation to guarantee the full exercise of this right. It lacks the legitimacy that should come from the production site, since it wasn’t promulgated by any democratic institution.
The ban on prior censorship.